JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| SHAFT JONES |
| DAVID ORTIZ and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2018cv13943 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Robert B Kugler |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Clerk to reopen case. ORDERED that Plaintiff's IFP is GRANTED. ORDERED that the Complaint shall be filed. ORDERED that SUMMONS SHALL NOT ISSUE, at this time, etc. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 11/6/2018. (rss, n.m.)
|
|
COMPLAINT against DAVID ORTIZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA with JURY DEMAND, filed by SHAFT JONES. See #1 for documents(rss, )
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION/MOTION to Reopen Case by SHAFT JONES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tf, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's IFP without prejudice. ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case. ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to re-open this action, he shall so notify the Court within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order, etc. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 9/27/2018. (rss,n.m. and ifp sent )
|
|
***Civil Case Terminated. (rss, )
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Exhibit, #3 envelope)(rss, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
