GAINES v. SECURITY GUARD, INC.
| RODERICK D. GAINES, JR. |
| Security Guard Inc. T/A Tri-County Security and SECURITY GUARD, INC. |
| 1:2018cv16853 |
| December 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Jerome B Simandle |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RODERICK D. GAINES, JR. SECURITY GUARD, INC. waiver sent on 12/13/2018, answer due 2/11/2019. (MURPHY, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to SECURITY GUARD, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (cry, )
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Caption,Cause of Action,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, )
|
|
Judge Jerome B. Simandle and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dd, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Security Guard Inc. T/A Tri-County Security ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9217816) with JURY DEMAND, filed by RODERICK D. GAINES, JR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MURPHY, MICHAEL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
