APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC. v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 et al
| APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC. |
| B&G FIRE PROTECTION, INC. and CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 |
| 1:2019cv00300 |
| January 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order Initial Conference set for 4/9/2019 10:00 AM in Room 2010 before Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio on 3/6/2019. (rss, )
|
| Filing 10 Amended Complaint ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND Affirmative Defenses, CROSSCLAIM against APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC. by CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2.(DEVINS, MICHAEL) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #9 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 3/6/2019. (rss, ) |
| Filing 9 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (DEVINS, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 8 proposed Order Extending Time to ANSWER to Amended Complaint by CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2.(DEVINS, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL B. DEVINS on behalf of CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 (DEVINS, MICHAEL) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Application/Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time #8 filed by MICHAEL DEVINS on 2/5/2019 was submitted incorrectly as an Answer. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE document USING event Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order found under OTHER DOCUMENTS. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (rss, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC.. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 served on 1/28/2019, answer due 2/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified mail return receipt)(DUFFEY, MARTIN) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against B&G FIRE PROTECTION, INC., CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2, filed by APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC..(DUFFEY, MARTIN) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; Plaintiff has fifteen (15) days to amend complaint, etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 1/14/2019. (rss, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to B&G FIRE PROTECTION, INC., CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (cry, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC. identifying APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY, INC. as Corporate Parent.. (DUFFEY, MARTIN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against B&G FIRE PROTECTION, INC., CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9294679) with JURY DEMAND, filed by APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DUFFEY, MARTIN) |
|
Order in all cases in which the basis of jurisdiction is 28 U.S.C. 1332, Diversity of Citizenship: Whether or not the Court issues an Order to Show Cause or other Order directing the filing of an amended pleading or removal petition on the issue of jurisdiction, the parties in all diversity cases are required to complete and file a Joint Certification of the Citizenship of the Parties, #click here, no later than the first Rule 16 conference.. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 1/9/2019. (cry, )
|
| Judge Noel L. Hillman and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
