REBACK v. CVS et al
Plaintiff: BEVERLY REBACK
Defendant: CVS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and CVS HEALTH
Case Number: 1:2019cv00318
Filed: January 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Joseph H Rodriguez
Referring Judge: Karen M Williams
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER Due to a scheduling conflict, the Court hereby reschedules the in-person Initial Conference previously set for February 28, 2019. The new date and time of the in-person Initial conference is March 14, 2019 at 3:30 p.m. in Room 2040 - Camden. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 2/13/19. (nar)
January 17, 2019 Filing 4 Def. New Jersey CVS Pharmacy, LLC, improperly named in Complaint as CVS, CVS Health ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against JOHN DOES 1-10 by CVS.(DONNELLY, FRANCIS)
January 10, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CVS identifying CVS Pharmacy as Corporate Parent.. (DONNELLY, FRANCIS)
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order Initial Conference set for 2/28/2019 10:30 AM in Room 2040 before Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 1/10/2019. (cry, )
January 10, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by New Jersey CVS Pharmacy, LLC, from Burlington County Superior Court, case number L-2755-18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9295767), filed by New Jersey CVS Pharmacy, LLC,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A and B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(DONNELLY, FRANCIS)
January 10, 2019 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (cry, )
January 10, 2019 Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, )
January 10, 2019 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Caption,Cause of Action,Jury Demand,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REBACK v. CVS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS
Represented By: FRANCIS X. DONNELLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS HEALTH
Represented By: FRANCIS X. DONNELLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BEVERLY REBACK
Represented By: MICHAEL FOSTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?