DANIELS v. ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
| GINA DANIELS |
| JOHN DOES 1-25 and ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC. |
| 1:2019cv00716 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Joseph H Rodriguez |
| Joel Schneider |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GINA DANIELS. ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC. served on 2/5/2019, answer due 2/26/2019. (SAKS, YAAKOV) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (cry, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARS NATIONAL SERVICES INC., JOHN DOES 1-25 ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9318393) with JURY DEMAND, filed by GINA DANIELS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SAKS, YAAKOV) |
| Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez and Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider added. (dd, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
