CHARRAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: SUBRINA CHARRAN
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Case Number: 1:2019cv01470
Filed: January 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Jose L Linares
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SUBRINA CHARRAN. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY served on 2/15/2019, answer due 4/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proof of service on General Counsel, #2 Proof of service on U S Attorney Fitzpatrick, #3 Proof of service on U S Attorney General)(TOVINSKY, LAUREN)
February 11, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (rss, )
February 11, 2019 Filing 6 Request for Summons to be Issued by SUBRINA CHARRAN as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. (TOVINSKY, LAUREN)
February 11, 2019 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The letter #5 filed by LAUREN S. TOVINSKY on 2/8/2019 was submitted incorrectly as a letter. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE document USING event Summons-Request for Issue found under SERVICE OF PROCESS. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (rss, )
February 8, 2019 Filing 5 Letter from plaintiff requesting issuance of summons for service. (TOVINSKY, LAUREN)
February 8, 2019 Filing 4 Letter from plaintiff request issuance of summons for service. (TOVINSKY, LAUREN)
February 8, 2019 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Letter #4 submitted by Lauren Tovinsky on 2/8/2019 did not contain a proper electronic signature (s/). PLEASE RESUBMIT THE DOCUMENT WITH THE PROPER ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE (s/ Attorney's Name.) This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (rtm, )
February 7, 2019 Filing 3 CLERK'S LETTER: Transmittal of USM 285 Forms. (cry, )
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's IFP. ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, the U.S. Marshal serve a copy of the complaint etc.. Signed by Chief Judge Jose L. Linares on 2/5/2019. (cry, )
February 7, 2019 COMPLAINT #1 against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, filed by SUBRINA CHARRAN.(cry, )
January 29, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application IFP, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(TOVINSKY, LAUREN) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/29/2019: #5 Text of Proposed Order) (cry, ).
January 29, 2019 Chief Judge Jose L. Linares added. (dd, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHARRAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SUBRINA CHARRAN
Represented By: LAUREN S. TOVINSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?