JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. FORUPK LLC et al
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. |
FORUPK LLC and MICHAEL SOLL |
1:2019cv07970 |
March 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Robert B Kugler |
Karen M Williams |
Cable/Satellite TV |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to MICHAEL SOLL for failure to plead or otherwise defend. (dmr) |
Filing 6 Request for Default by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. against Michael Soll. (JANIS, RYAN) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.. MICHAEL SOLL served on 4/9/2019, answer due 4/30/2019. (JANIS, RYAN) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.. FORUPK LLC served on 4/9/2019, answer due 4/30/2019. (JANIS, RYAN) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to FORUPK LLC, MICHAEL SOLL. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (cry, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.. (JANIS, RYAN) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FORUPK LLC, MICHAEL SOLL ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9476263), filed by JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JANIS, RYAN) |
Judge Robert B. Kugler and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.