Brackman v. Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al
| Karen Brackman |
| ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD, Huahui U.S., Inc., DOES 1 THROUGH 100, SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S. LLC and PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. |
| VALSARTAN N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE (NDMA) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION |
| 1:2019cv12085 |
| May 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Robert B Kugler |
| Joel Schneider |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of Tennessee Middle; Case Number 3:19-cv-00299. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Judge Robert B. Kugler and Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider added. (dd, ) |
| For all Case Management Orders #click here (dd, ) |
| Case transferred from Middle District of Tennessee (3:19-cv-299) on 5/3/19, for MDL 2875 (dd, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Pursuant to the Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-5) of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Docket No. 2875, this case is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and electronically transmit the record to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/2/19. (gb)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED COPY of CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 5) received from the District of New Jersey. (Case is ready for closing/transfer; Proposed order submitted to chambers). (af) |
| Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 5) filed by the UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, IN RE: VALSARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2875, transferring this case to the District of New Jersey. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. (af) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/11/19. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (gb)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/17/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (gb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (gb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (gb) |
| Copy of complaint and docket sheet emailed to MDL Clerk of Court re MDL 2875. (af) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Andrea T. McKellar. FL State Bar status verified as active for Daniel A. Nigh. (gb) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL Daniel A. Nigh: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court where admitted, and pay a fee of $100.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 5/2/2019. (gb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1 through 100, Huahui U.S., Inc., Prinston Pharmaceutical, Inc., Solco Healthcare US, LLC, Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Filing fee paid $400, Receipt number 0650-2889326), filed by Karen Brackman. Service copies not provided. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(gb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
