MEACHAM v. DRYDEN DIVING COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff: MANETTE B. MEACHAM
Defendant: DRYDEN DIVING CO., INC. and DRYDEN DIVING COMPANY, INC.
Case Number: 1:2019cv12398
Filed: May 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Jerome B Simandle
Referring Judge: Karen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2019 CLERK'S TEXT ORDER - The Application for a Clerk's Order Extending Time to Answer - Document #7 submitted by DRYDEN DIVING COMPANY, INC. on 6/20/20119has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/8/2019.(dmr)
June 20, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by All Defendants. (DENGLER, ROBERT)
June 20, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by ROBERT NEIL DENGLER on behalf of All Defendants (DENGLER, ROBERT)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Denying without prejudice #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Nicholas P. Giuliano, Esq. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 6/18/2019. (dmr)
June 5, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MANETTE B. MEACHAM. DRYDEN DIVING COMPANY, INC. served on 5/31/2019, answer due 6/21/2019. (GORDEN, MATTHEW)
June 4, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (by Nicholas P. Giuliano, Esq.). Motion set for 7/1/2019 before Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dmr)
June 3, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (by Nicholas P. Giuliano, Esq.) by MANETTE B. MEACHAM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(GORDEN, MATTHEW)
May 10, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to DRYDEN DIVING COMPANY, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (cry, )
May 9, 2019 Judge Jerome B. Simandle and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, )
May 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DRYDEN DIVING CO., INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9655156) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MANETTE B. MEACHAM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(GORDEN, MATTHEW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MEACHAM v. DRYDEN DIVING COMPANY, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DRYDEN DIVING CO., INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DRYDEN DIVING COMPANY, INC.
Represented By: ROBERT NEIL DENGLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MANETTE B. MEACHAM
Represented By: MATTHEW M. GORDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?