ANCHOR CONSULTANTS, LLC v. LIBERTY TERMINAL AT PENNSAUKEN, LLC
| ANCHOR CONSULTANTS, LLC |
| LIBERTY TERMINAL AT PENNSAUKEN, LLC and LIBERTY TERMINAL |
| 1:2019cv13876 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Joel Schneider |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to LIBERTY TERMINAL AT PENNSAUKEN, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (cry, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ANCHOR CONSULTANTS, LLC. (REEVES, MARY) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LIBERTY TERMINAL AT PENNSAUKEN, LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9746869), filed by ANCHOR CONSULTANTS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(REEVES, MARY) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, ) |
| Judge Noel L. Hillman and Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider added. (dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
