PELLE v. REGAL IDEAS, INC. et al
| JOSEPH PELLE |
| Regal Ideas, Inc., JOHN DOE I-VIII, DIAL ACQUISITIONS PRODUCTS, REGAL ALUMINUM PRODUCTS, INC., NORMAN LIEFKO, TELESTEPS LIMITED, LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, TELESTEPS, THE HARTFORD, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP, HULTSTEG AB, TELESTEPS, INC., DIAL INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC., HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, TELESCOPIC WORLDWIDE INCORPORATED and TELESTEPS AB |
| 1:2019cv14112 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Joel Schneider |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Transmittal Letter for remanded case to Atlantic County Courthouse1201 Bacharach BoulevardAtlantic City, NJ 08401 State No: ATL L 1399 18. Mailed certified copy of the Order remanding case. (rss, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER Remanding case to State Court. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/9/2019. (rss, )
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Andrew S, Riso, Esq. re 5 Order,,,. (RISO, ANDREW) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER. This matter comes before the Court upon the pre-motion conference letter filed by Plaintiff Joseph Pelle on June 27, 2019 [Dkt. No. 4], asserting that this case should be remanded to the Superior Court of New Jersey because 28 U.S.C. 1446(b) bars removal of this diversity suit which was commenced more than a year ago. Defendant Regal Ideas, Inc. has failed to address Plaintiffs letter within five (5) business days as required by Rule I.A of this Courts Individual Rules and Procedures. It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant Regal Ideas, Inc. shall SHOW CAUSE before this Court within three (3) business days: (a) why it has failed to timely respond to Plaintiffs pre-motion letter AND (b) why this case should not be remanded. If no response is filed, the Court will likely remand this suit. So Ordered by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/9/19. (ar1, )
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (rss, ) |
| Filing 4 Letter from joseph monaco. (MONACO, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by SUZANNE M. MARASCO on behalf of REGAL IDEAS, INC. (MARASCO, SUZANNE) |
|
Filing 2
Order Initial Conference set for 7/31/2019 11:30 AM in Room 2060 before Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider on 6/25/2019. (cry, )
|
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (cry, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Attorney Information,Caption,Cause of Action,Jurisdiction,Jury Demand,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (cry, ) |
| Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider added. (dd, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Regal Ideas, Inc. from Atlantic, case number ATL-L-1399-18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9760944), filed by Regal Ideas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Notice of filing of removal, #2 Certificate of Service)(RISO, ANDREW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
