KAMINENI et al v. TESLA, INC.
| SANDHYA KAMINENI and ARUN KANDRA |
| TESLA, INC. |
| 1:2019cv14288 |
| June 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Robert B Kugler |
| Karen M Williams |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by TESLA, INC. re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and Compel Arbitration (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(KELLNER, LELAND) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER Upon letter application dated July 23, 2019 from Michael Power, Esquire, counsel for plaintiffs, and it appearing that all counsel consent to the request to reschedule the telephone status conference previously set for August 1, 2019, the Court hereby GRANTS the request. The new date and time of the in-person Initial Conference is September 4, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. in Room 2040 - Camden. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 7/25/19. (nar)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Michael Power, Esq.. (POWER, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by All Plaintiffs re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and Compel Arbitration (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, #2 Certification Certification of Michael Power, Esq. in opposition to Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E, #8 Text of Proposed Order, #9 Certificate of Service)(POWER, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and Compel Arbitration by TESLA, INC.. Responses due by 7/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order, #2 Affidavit, #3 Brief, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Exhibit B, #7 Exhibit C)(KELLNER, LELAND) |
| Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and Compel Arbitration. Motion set for 8/5/2019 before Judge Robert B. Kugler. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (rss, ) |
|
Filing 3
Order Initial Conference set for 8/1/2019 11:00 AM in Room 2040 before Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 6/27/2019. (cry, )
|
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action,Jury Demand, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (cry, ) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (cry, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TESLA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(KELLNER, LELAND) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TESLA, INC. from Superior Court of NJ, Camden County, case number L-001006-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9771702), filed by TESLA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Exhibit A)(KELLNER, LELAND) |
| Judge Robert B. Kugler and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
