PRUITT v. DAVIS et al
Petitioner: SHAKEYSHA L. PRUITT
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and SARAH DAVIS
Case Number: 1:2019cv14529
Filed: July 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please note the Order attached to docket entry #8 filed by the Clerk's office on 8/1/2019 is a duplicate of the Order #7 , and was docketed in error. Please disregard. (rtm, )
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting #6 request for an extension of 45 days to file an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/31/2019. (rtm, )(nm)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Granting #6 request for an extension of time to file an answer to the petition, etc. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/31/2019. (rtm, )(nm)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Letter from Respondents seeking extension to file response re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(SCHARFF, NANCY)
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by NANCY P. SCHARFF on behalf of ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SARAH DAVIS (SCHARFF, NANCY)
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Letter request from DAG to be removed from noticing.. (HENDERSON, CAROL)
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a Notice of Electronic Filing of this Order on the State of New Jersey, Department of Law & Public Safety. ORDERED that if the Bureau intends to refer the action to a County Prosecutors Office, the Bureau will use its best efforts to upload to CM/ECF a referral letter indicating the name of that office within fourteen days, etc. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/10/2019. (rtm, )(nm)
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono by SHAKEYSHA L. PRUITT. (ssp, )
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number CAM010533.), filed by SHAKEYSHA L. PRUITT. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ssp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PRUITT v. DAVIS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Represented By: NANCY P. SCHARFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SARAH DAVIS
Represented By: NANCY P. SCHARFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SHAKEYSHA L. PRUITT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?