BECKETT v. POWELL et al
STEFAN CURRY BECKETT |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JOHN POWELL |
1:2019cv14559 |
June 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Noel L Hillman |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Exhibit to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signature page. by STEFAN CURRY BECKETT. (rtm, )(nm) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing the Clerk to mail to petitioner a blank habeas form. ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case. ORDERED that the petitioner has 30 days to respond to this order if he wishes to reopen this case, etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 8/7/2019. (rtm, )(nm) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number CAM010579 (ssp, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying Plaintiff's IFP. ORDERED that Clerk shall administratively terminate this case for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case he shall so notify the Court within 30 days of the date of this order, etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 7/23/2019. (ssp, n.m. ) |
Filing 2 OPINION. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 7/23/2019. (ssp, n.m.) |
***Civil Case Terminated. (ssp, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STEFAN CURRY BECKETT. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(cry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.