ROBERTS v. TAYLOR et al
Petitioner: MICHAEL HENRY ROBERTS
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTORS OFFICE CAMDEN COUNTY NEW JERSEY, JUDGE RAGONESE and WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR
Case Number: 1:2019cv16908
Filed: August 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Noel L Hillman
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO ANSWER. ORDERED that Respondent shall file a Motion to Dismiss or an Answer within 45 days, etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 10/11/2019. (dmr)(n.m.)
October 10, 2019 Filing 5 Letter request from DAG to be removed from noticing.. (HENDERSON, CAROL)
September 27, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law by MICHAEL HENRY ROBERTS. (dmr)
September 27, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Motion set for 10/21/2019 before Judge Noel L. Hillman. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dmr, )
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Granting Petitioner's IFP application. ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on Petitioner by regular mail. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 9/4/2019. (cry, n.m.)
August 29, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for for Summary Judgment for by MICHAEL HENRY ROBERTS. (dmr)
August 19, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MICHAEL HENRY ROBERTS. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Envelope 1, #9 Envelope 2)(cry, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/28/2019) (aji).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROBERTS v. TAYLOR et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PROSECUTORS OFFICE CAMDEN COUNTY NEW JERSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JUDGE RAGONESE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MICHAEL HENRY ROBERTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?