SCHWARTZ v. MOUNT LAUREL VETERINARY SERVICES, LLC et al
ZEEV SCHWARTZ |
CHRISTOPHER TORRE, MOUNT LAUREL VETERINARY SERVICES, LLC and ROBERT MANKOWSKI |
1:2019cv17245 |
August 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Joseph H Rodriguez |
Joel Schneider |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ZEEV SCHWARTZ. ROBERT MANKOWSKI waiver sent on 8/27/2019, answer due 10/28/2019; MOUNT LAUREL VETERINARY SERVICES, LLC waiver sent on 8/27/2019, answer due 10/28/2019; CHRISTOPHER TORRE waiver sent on 8/27/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (KARPF, ARI) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by JEREMY M. CERUTTI on behalf of ZEEV SCHWARTZ (CERUTTI, JEREMY) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ROBERT MANKOWSKI, MOUNT LAUREL VETERINARY SERVICES, LLC, CHRISTOPHER TORRE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ssp, ) |
Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez and Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider added. (dd, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBERT MANKOWSKI, MOUNT LAUREL VETERINARY SERVICES, LLC, CHRISTOPHER TORRE ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9922733) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ZEEV SCHWARTZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(KARPF, ARI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.