HUBBARD v. ORTIZ
MARC HUBBARD |
WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ |
1:2019cv18058 |
September 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono by MARC HUBBARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aji, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number CAM010702.), filed by MARC HUBBARD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Filing Fee, #3 Envelope) (aji, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HUBBARD v. ORTIZ | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ | |
Represented By: | JOHN ANDREW RUYMANN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: MARC HUBBARD | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.