ROTHMAN v. STRANGER
| DOUGLAS S. STRANGER and DOUGLAS S. STANGER |
| ANDREW BERNARD ROTHMAN |
| 1:2019cv19792 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Robert B Kugler |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for an injunction and to Stay case by ANDREW BERNARD ROTHMAN. (rtm, )(nm) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF in support of Appellant's notice of appeal of the overruling of Appellant's objection to the chapter 7 trustee abandonment motion (rtm, ) |
| Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Stay. Motion set for 1/21/2020 before Judge Robert B. Kugler. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (rtm, ) |
| Filing 4 Signed Document to #3 Designation of Record on Appeal (Bankruptcy)by ANDREW BERNARD ROTHMAN. (tf, ) |
| Filing 3 UNSIGNED DESIGNATION of Record on Appeal by ANDREW BERNARD ROTHMAN re #1 Bankruptcy Appeal. Parties wishing to review the actual documents listed on the U.S. Bankruptcy Court`s docket sheet should refer to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court`s records. At the direction of this Court, counsel for the appellant must furnish paper copies of these documents directly to the Chambers of the Honorable, U.S. District Judge. These courtesy copies should be clearly marked as `Courtesy Copies` and should contain the U.S. District Court civil docket number. Pursuant to Federal Bankruptcy Rule 8018 (a), unless otherwise ordered, the appellant must serve and file a brief within 30 days after the docketing of the notice that the record has been transmitted or is available electronically;the appellee must serve and file a brief within 30 days of service of the appellant`s brief;the appellant may serve and file a reply brief within 14 days after service of the appellee`s brief. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(tf, ) |
| Filing 2 DESIGNATION of Record on Appeal by ANDREW BERNARD ROTHMAN re #1 Bankruptcy Appeal. Parties wishing to review the actual documents listed on the U.S. Bankruptcy Court`s docket sheet should refer to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court`s records. At the direction of this Court, counsel for the appellant must furnish paper copies of these documents directly to the Chambers of the Honorable Robert B. Kugler, U.S. District Judge. These courtesy copies should be clearly marked as `Courtesy Copies` and should contain the U.S. District Court civil docket number. Pursuant to Federal Bankruptcy Rule 8018 (a), unless otherwise ordered, the appellant must serve and file a brief within 30 days after the docketing of the notice that the record has been transmitted or is available electronically;the appellee must serve and file a brief within 30 days of service of the appellant`s brief;the appellant may serve and file a reply brief within 14 days after service of the appellee`s brief. Appellant Brief due by 12/2/2019. (cry, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 19-15963, filed by ANDREW BERNARD ROTHMAN. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal letter)(cry, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/5/2019: #2 Order) (dd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
