GRANT v. PANICO et al
FRANCIENNA GRANT |
WILLIAM H. PANICO D.M.D. and WILLIAM HUNTLEY PANICO |
1:2019cv20535 |
November 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Joel Schneider |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directing Plaintiff to show cause by written submission within 14 days why the cases should not be dismissed because they are appeals from prior state court decisions, over which this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 1/7/2020. (dmr)(n.m.) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE by written submission, within 14 days of the date of this Order, why the cases should not be dismissed. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 12/19/2019. (tf, n.m.) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 1/21/2020 before Judge Renee Marie Bumb. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (tf, ) |
Filing 10 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants 12/11/2019 letter to the Court from FRANCIENNA GRANT. (rss, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by All Defendants. Responses due by 1/7/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Mtn to Dismiss, #2 Brief to Mtn to Dismiss)(BREYMEIER, JOSEPH) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER The Court is in receipt of Defendant William H. Panico`s letter [Dkt. No. 7], requesting a pre-motion conference to discuss his proposed motion to dismiss. However, as noted in Section I.A of this Court`s Individual Rules and Procedures, ``this letter exchange does not apply in cases in which either side is pro se.`` Therefore, because Plaintiff Francienna Grant is proceeding pro se, no pre-motion letter exchange is required and Defendant may proceed with filing his motion if he wishes to do so. So Ordered by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 12/12/2019. (Costigan, Roberta) |
Filing 7 Letter from CHARLES B. AUSTERMUHL, ESQUIRE. (BREYMEIER, JOSEPH) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by JOSEPH A. BREYMEIER on behalf of All Defendants (BREYMEIER, JOSEPH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by JOSEPH A. BREYMEIER on behalf of All Defendants (BREYMEIER, JOSEPH) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Notices of Appearance #3 and #4 submitted by JOSEPH A. BREYMEIER on 12/10/2019 contains an improper signature. Only the filing user is permitted to sign electronically filed documents with an s/. PLEASE RESUBMIT with a proper scanned signature if he attorneys are not using their own ECF accounts submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (dmr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JOSEPH A. BREYMEIER on behalf of All Defendants (BREYMEIER, JOSEPH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by JOSEPH A. BREYMEIER on behalf of All Defendants (BREYMEIER, JOSEPH) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to WILLIAM HUNTLEY PANICO, WILLIAM H. PANICO D.M.D. with answer to complaint due within 21 days. (cry, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIAM HUNTLEY PANICO, WILLIAM H. PANICO D.M.D. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number CAM010857) with JURY DEMAND, filed by FRANCIENNA GRANT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope)(cry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.