BLOOM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| IRA BLOOM |
| WARDEN DAVID E. ORTIZ and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2019cv21982 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MOTION for Reconsideration re #3 Order by IRA BLOOM. (tf, )
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION for Reconsideration re #3 Order. Motion set for 3/2/2020 before Judge Renee Marie Bumb. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (tf, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction; Clerk shall close this matter. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 1/24/2020. (tf, n.m.)
|
|
Filing 2
OPINION. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 1/24/2020. (tf, n.m.)
|
|
***Civil Case Terminated. (tf, )
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number CAM010994 (cry, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by IRA BLOOM. NO FF/IFP (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Envelope)(cry, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
