AUSTINO v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
| ADAM R. AUSTINO |
| CITY OF VINELAND, GREGORY PACITTO, ANTHONY FANUCCI and POLICEMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 266 |
| 1:2020cv01151 |
| February 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Joseph H Rodriguez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CITY OF VINELAND, ANTHONY FANUCCI, GREGORY PACITTO, POLICEMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 266. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (cry, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10352608) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ADAM R. AUSTINO.(FOX, WILLIAM) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: In the future when choosing parties please choose each party individually. Do not select "all plaintiffs" or "all defendants." . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, ) |
| Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
