DAWSON v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD. et al
| NELLIE DAWSON |
| TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD., AVKARE, INC., HUMANA PHARMACY, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., A-S MEDICATION SOLUTIONS, LLC, MYLAN, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., MYLAN N.V., BRYANT RANCH PREPACK, INC., ACTAVIS, LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., THE HARVARD DRUG GROUP, LLC D/B/A MAJOR PHARMACEUTICALS and NORTHWIND PHARMACEUTICALS |
| 1:2020cv01493 |
| February 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Robert B Kugler |
| Joel Schneider |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A-S MEDICATION SOLUTIONS, LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS, LLC, AVKARE, INC., BRYANT RANCH PREPACK, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., HUMANA PHARMACY, INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD., MYLAN N.V., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MYLAN, INC., NORTHWIND PHARMACEUTICALS, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., THE HARVARD DRUG GROUP, LLC D/B/A MAJOR PHARMACEUTICALS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10400151) with JURY DEMAND, filed by NELLIE DAWSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BOLDT, PAIGE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
