BOSCO v. TYCIAK et al
| CHARLES BOSCO |
| DEANNA TYCIAK and TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN |
| 1:2020cv03440 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Joel Schneider |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Order Initial Conference set for 5/13/2020 09:30 AM in Room 2010 before Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider on 3/31/2020. (cry, )
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN from Gloucester County Superior Court, case number GLO-316-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10625583), filed by TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MADDEN, PATRICK) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Caption,Cause of Action,Party Information is to be entered in CAPITAL LETTERS. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, ) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (cry, ) |
| Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider added. (dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
