SANTOS v. KERRIHARO
| JOSE SANTOS, JR. |
| TIMOTHY KERRIHARO and TIMOTHY KERRIHARD |
| 1:2020cv06309 |
| May 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Karen M Williams |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to TIMOTHY KERRIHARO. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (cry, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TIMOTHY KERRIHARO ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10854883) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOSE SANTOS, JR.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIMON, MARC) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Defendants added to the docket do not reflect the alias information listed in the caption of the complaint. In the future please make sure to add all information as represented in the caption. . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, ) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences (RMB). #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (cry, ) |
| Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (cry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
