FLEMING-MARTINEZ v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY et al
| BOIVAE FLEMING-MARTINEZ |
| NATASHA CRANMER, YVETTE RAMOS, MRS. JOHNSON, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, VIRGINIA KENNY and AMANDA HAMMOND |
| 1:2020cv13098 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Robert B Kugler |
| Karen M Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUMMONS ISSUED as to NATASHA CRANMER, AMANDA HAMMOND, JOHNSON, VIRGINIA KENNY, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, YVETTE RAMOS with answer to complaint due within 21 days. (cry, summons and prose packet mailed to Plaintiff's address)
|
|
COMPLAINT #1 against NATASHA CRANMER, AMANDA HAMMOND, JOHNSON, VIRGINIA KENNY, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, YVETTE RAMOS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number TRE115281), filed by BOIVAE FLEMING-MARTINEZ.(cry, )
|
|
Initial Filing fee of $400 received, receipt number TRE115281. (jem)
|
|
Filing 3
Letter from BOIVAE FLEMING-MARTINEZ re: IFP Application (sent). (dmr)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerk's Letter: Complaint not accompanied by the filing fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis. (cry, )
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint Received. NO FF/IFP (cry, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
