ORTIZ v. CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC
Plaintiff: ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant: CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Case Number: 1:2020cv14829
Filed: October 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Referring Judge: Karen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STIPULATED ORDER Granting extension of time to 1/25/2021 for Defendant to respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 12/15/2020. (rtm, )
December 14, 2020 Filing 7 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT by CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC. (SOVEN, ANDREW)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting the #5 Stipulation filed by CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC. ORDERED that Defendant shall file their response to the Complaint on or before 12/14/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 11/16/2020. (rtm, )
November 13, 2020 Filing 5 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT by CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC. (SOVEN, ANDREW)
November 12, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by ANDREW J. SOVEN on behalf of CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC (SOVEN, ANDREW)
October 30, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ANGEL ORTIZ. CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC served on 10/23/2020, answer due 11/13/2020. (KAPLAN, BEN)
October 22, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (pr, )
October 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11543922) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ANGEL ORTIZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KAPLAN, BEN)
October 22, 2020 Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, )
October 22, 2020 Notice of Judicial Preferences. RMB #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (pr, )
October 22, 2020 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ORTIZ v. CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARSON SMITHFIELD, LLC
Represented By: ANDREW J. SOVEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANGEL ORTIZ
Represented By: BEN A. KAPLAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?