DAOUD v. WOLF et al
MR. MOHAMMAD DAOUD and MOHAMMAD DAOUD |
FIELD OFFICE DIRECTO YA-MEI CHEN, WILLIAM P. BARR, MR. CRAIG CARPENTINO, THE HONORABLE CHAD WOLF, USCIS KENNETH T CUCCINELLI, USCIS DISTRICT DIREC JOHN THOMPSON, YA-MEI CHEN, CHAD WOLF, KENNETH T CUCCINELLI, JOHN THOMPSON and CRAIG CARPENTINO |
1:2020cv15225 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to WILLIAM P. BARR, CRAIG CARPENTINO, YA-MEI CHEN, KENNETH T CUCCINELLI, JOHN THOMPSON, CHAD WOLF. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (pr, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, ) |
Notice of Judicial Preferences. RMB #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (pr, ) |
Judge Renee Marie Bumb added. (dd, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11582109), filed by MOHAMMAD DAOUD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Page, #3 Exhibit)(VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.