RUSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS FORT DIX et al
| KEVIN RUSS |
| DAVE ORTIZ and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS FORT DIX |
| 1:2020cv18892 |
| December 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this case and supply Plaintiff with a blank IFP application; If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case they shall notify the Court in writing within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 12/23/2020. (cry, notice and IFP mailed)
|
| Filing 4 OPINION. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 12/23/2020. (cry, ) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (cry, ) |
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case Number 3:20-cv-18892 Reallocated and Reassigned to Judge Noel L. Hillman and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio for all further proceedings. Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni no longer assigned to case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 12/18/2020. (eaj)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by KEVIN RUSS. (mg) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 ADDRESS REQ., #3 ENVELOPE)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
