RIVARD v. TRIP MATE, INC. et al
| FRANCIS RIVARD |
| TRIP MATE, INC. and UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2021cv01625 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Joseph H Rodriguez |
| Matthew J Skahill |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Letter from Amey J. Park (Counsel for Plaintiff) re adjournment of May 3, 2021 Motion Day to the following Motion Day, May 17, 2021 re Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings,. (Park, Amey)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion set for 5/3/2021 before Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dmr)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss by TRIP MATE, INC., UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. Responses due by 4/19/2021 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(LEVENTHAL, MARKHAM)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill added. (dd, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' response to the Complaint is due to be filed on or before March 30, 2021. Signed by Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez on 3/5/2021. (tf, )
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Update Answer Due Deadline, #1 Complaint . Motion set for 4/5/2021 before Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dmr, )
|
|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Update Answer Due Deadline, #1 Complaint by TRIP MATE, INC., UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(LEVENTHAL, MARKHAM)
|
|
Clerk's Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order, submitted by UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, TRIP MATE, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 3/9/2021. (dmr)
|
|
Filing 5
Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendants Trip Mate, Inc. and United States Fire Insurance Co.. Attorney MARKHAM RICHARD LEVENTHAL for TRIP MATE, INC.,MARKHAM RICHARD LEVENTHAL for UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY added. (LEVENTHAL, MARKHAM)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by FRANCIS RIVARD. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY served on 2/4/2021, answer due 2/25/2021. (Park, Amey)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by FRANCIS RIVARD. TRIP MATE, INC. served on 2/2/2021, answer due 2/23/2021. (Park, Amey)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to TRIP MATE, INC., UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (pr, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against TRIP MATE, INC., UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12066496) with JURY DEMAND, filed by FRANCIS RIVARD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Park, Amey)
|
|
Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez added. (dd, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
