ELK v. KARPINSKI et al
| AL ELK and AL T. ELK |
| JARED M BOYD, KIMBERLY KARPINSKI, BRENNAN F SULLIVAN, OTHER UNNAMED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, ANGEL CRUZ, OTHER UNNAMED MEMBERS OF THE NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, TROOPER KIMBERLY KARPINSKI, TROOPER ANGEL CRUZ, TROOPER JARED M BOYD and TROOPER BRENNAN F SULLIVAN |
| 1:2021cv02491 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JARED M BOYD, ANGEL CRUZ, KIMBERLY KARPINSKI, BRENNAN F SULLIVAN. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (pr, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Caption,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, ) |
| Judge Noel L. Hillman and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dd, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AL ELK ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12122463) with JURY DEMAND, filed by AL ELK.(LANG, ARTHUR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
