SHULTZ v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CHRISTOPHER SHULTZ |
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION |
1:2021cv03770 |
March 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Noel L Hillman |
Karen M Williams |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal [Proposed] by FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION. (SHAFIEI, IMMON) |
Set Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaim. Motion set for 5/17/2021 before Judge Noel L. Hillman. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (rss, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaim by CHRISTOPHER SHULTZ. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Brief, #3 Declaration of Sean J. Kirby, #4 Exhibit A to Sean Kirby's Declaration, #5 Exhibit B to Sean Kirby's Declaration)(KIRBY, SEAN) |
![]() |
Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (tf, ) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION identifying Freedom Mortgage Corporation as Corporate Parent.. (SHAFIEI, IMMON) |
Filing 4 Freedom Mortgage ANSWER to Complaint , First COUNTERCLAIM against CHRISTOPHER SHULTZ by FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Employment Agreement, #2 Exhibit Confidentiality Agreement)(SHAFIEI, IMMON) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CHRISTOPHER SHULTZ. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION served on 3/5/2021, answer due 3/26/2021. (KIRBY, SEAN) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (pr, ) |
![]() |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, ) |
Judge Noel L. Hillman and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12207424) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Christopher Shultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(KIRBY, SEAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SHULTZ v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER SHULTZ | |
Represented By: | SEAN J. KIRBY |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | IMMON SHAFIEI |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.