WALAWENDER v. HUTCHINSON et al
WIESLAW J WALAWENDER and WIESLAW J. WALAWENDER |
ROGER N HUTCHINSON, JMP LOGISTICS, LLC, ROGER N. HUTCHINSON, PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, JMP LOGISTICS, INC. and JOHN DOE I-III |
JMP LOGISTICS |
1:2021cv03906 |
March 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Matthew J Skahill |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Transmittal Letter for remanded case to Gloucester County Courthouse1 North Broad StreetWoodbury, NJ 08096 State No: GLO-L94-21. Mailed certified copy of the Order remanding case. (rtm, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER Remanding Case to State Court. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 4/15/2021. (rtm, ) |
***Civil Case Terminated. (rtm, ) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT by ROGER N. HUTCHINSON, JMP LOGISTICS, INC.. (WRIGHT, GRANT) |
Filing 7 Letter from Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit proposed stip to remand)(WRIGHT, GRANT) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against ROGER N. HUTCHINSON, JMP LOGISTICS, JMP LOGISTICS, INC., JMP LOGISTICS, LLC, WIESLAW J. WALAWENDER by PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.(STANZIANO, BRIAN) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon the pre-motion conference letter filed by Plaintiff Wieslaw J. Walawender on April 1, 2021 [Dkt. No. 4]. Defendants have failed to address Plaintiff's letter within five (5) business days as required by Rule I.A of this Court's Individual Rules and Procedures. It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants shall show cause before this Court within three (3) business days why they have failed to timely respond AND why the relief Plaintiff seeks in its pre-motion letter should not be granted. If no response is filed, the Court will likely grant Plaintiff the relief the motion seeks. So Ordered by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 04/08/2021. (Costigan, Roberta) |
Filing 4 Letter from counsel for Plaintiff. (MONACO, JOSEPH) |
Filing 3 Order Initial Conference set for 4/21/2021 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 3/15/2021. (pr, ) |
Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill added. (dd, ) |
Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (pr, ) |
Notice of Judicial Preferences. RMB. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (pr, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action,Jury Demand,Nature of Suit,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (pr, ) |
Judge Renee Marie Bumb added. (dd, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JMP LOGISTICS, LLC, ROGER N HUTCHINSON from Superior Court of New Jersey, case number GLO L 94 21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12215379), filed by JMP LOGISTICS, LLC, ROGER N HUTCHINSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(WRIGHT, GRANT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.