MAY v. JOHN DOE
| DAVID MAY |
| JOHN DOE, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTCAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., WALMART, INC., MYLAN N.V., ACTAVIS, LLC, MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. |
| VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION |
| 1:2021cv07634 |
| March 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Robert B Kugler |
| Karen M Williams |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE, MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD., MYLAN N.V., ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTCAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., ACTAVIS, LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., WALMART, INC., filed by DAVID MAY.(GOLDENBERG, MARLENE) |
| Member Case Direct File on 3/31/2021, for MDL 2875 VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. (pr, ) |
| For all Case Management Orders #click here (pr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12326291) with JURY DEMAND, filed by DAVID MAY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(GOLDENBERG, MARLENE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
