WOODRUFF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| DONNA WOODRUFF |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| 1:2021cv11285 |
| May 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File; the time in which Defendant may file the Electronic Certified Administrative Record is enlarged to September 17, 2021. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/1/2021. (tf, )
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File the Administrative Record. Motion set for 8/2/2021 before Judge Renee Marie Bumb. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (tf, )
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File the Administrative Record by COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Declaration)(MARKOS, EMILY)
|
|
Filing 5
(Finance notified), ORDER Granting Plaintiff's IFP application and directing the Clerk to file the complaint; Directing the clerk to issue a refund etc. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 5/27/2021. (pr, )
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by DONNA WOODRUFF. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY served on 5/24/2021, answer due 7/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service on U S Attorney District of NJ, #2 Proof of Service on Attorney General, #3 Proof of Service on General Counsel)(PETRUZZELLI, ROBERT)
|
|
Filing 3
Letter from plaintiff requesting consideration of IFP. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(PETRUZZELLI, ROBERT)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (pr, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12467106), filed by DONNA WOODRUFF. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service)(PETRUZZELLI, ROBERT)
|
|
Judge Renee Marie Bumb added. (dd, )
|
|
Notice of Judicial Preferences. RMB. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (pr, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WOODRUFF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DONNA WOODRUFF | |
| Represented By: | ROBERT ANTHONY PETRUZZELLI |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
| Represented By: | EMILY BRESLIN MARKOS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
