BENNETT v. U.S. SILICA COMPANY
Plaintiff: PHILIP BENNETT
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10 and U.S. SILICA COMPANY
Case Number: 1:2021cv11665
Filed: May 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Noel L Hillman
Referring Judge: Matthew J Skahill
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2021 Filing 12 Proposed Order Joint Stipulated Discovery Confidentiality Order by U.S. SILICA COMPANY. (LUCKNER, STEVEN)
July 7, 2021 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill: Initial Conference by phone held on 7/7/2021. (se, )
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephone Status Conference set for 11/8/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill. Amended Pleadings due by 9/24/2021. Pretrial Factual Discovery due by 3/25/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 9/20/2022, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 7/7/2021. (dmr)
July 7, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by ERIK DOUGHTY on behalf of U.S. SILICA COMPANY (DOUGHTY, ERIK)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Text Order: The call-in number for the initial conference scheduled for July 7, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. is 888-808-6929, access code 2170922#. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 7/6/21. (Shaw, A).
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to L. CIV. R. 7.1.1 (eff. June 21, 2021), the parties, including intervening parties, are required to file a statement (separate from any pleading) containing specific information regarding third-party litigation funding. See L. Civ. R. 7.1.1(a)(1-3). This statement shall be filed within 45 days of the effective date of this Rule, or no later than August 5, 2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 6/29/2021. (se, )
June 29, 2021 Filing 7 Joint Discovery Plan by U.S. SILICA COMPANY.(LUCKNER, STEVEN)
June 24, 2021 Filing 6 Certification on behalf of U.S. SILICA COMPANY. (LUCKNER, STEVEN)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Initial Conference set for 7/7/2021 at 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 6/15/2021. (dmr)
June 14, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. SILICA COMPANY.(LUCKNER, STEVEN)
May 27, 2021 Clerk's Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by U.S. SILICA COMPANY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 6/14/2021. (dmr)
May 26, 2021 Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Complaint.. (LUCKNER, STEVEN)
May 26, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by U.S. SILICA COMPANY identifying U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (LUCKNER, STEVEN)
May 24, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by U.S. SILICA COMPANY from Superior Court of New Jersey, Cumberland County, case number CUM-L-000255-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12488140), filed by U.S. SILICA COMPANY.(LUCKNER, STEVEN)
May 24, 2021 Judge Noel L. Hillman and Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill added. (dd, )
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Order in all cases in which the basis of jurisdiction is 28 U.S.C. 1332, Diversity of Citizenship: Whether or not the Court issues an Order to Show Cause or other Order directing the filing of an amended pleading or removal petition on the issue of jurisdiction, the parties in all diversity cases are required to complete and file a Joint Certification of the Citizenship of the Parties, #click here, no later than the first Rule 16 conference.. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 5/24/2021. (pr, )
May 24, 2021 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Jury Demand,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, )
May 24, 2021 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (pr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BENNETT v. U.S. SILICA COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. SILICA COMPANY
Represented By: STEVEN J. LUCKNER
Represented By: ERIK DOUGHTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHILIP BENNETT
Represented By: DRAKE P. BEARDEN, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?