SMITH v. FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
JOHN SMITH |
FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, O'CONNOR DENNIS and DENNIS O'CONNOR |
1:2021cv11787 |
May 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Sharon A King |
Robert B Kugler |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to L. Civ. R. 7.1.1(eff. June 21, 2021), the parties, including intervening parties, are required to file a statement (separate from any pleading) containing specific information regarding third-party litigation funding. See L. Civ. R. 7.1.1(a)(1-3). This statement shall be filed within 45 days of the effective date of this Rule, or no later than August 5, 2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 7/8/21. (mb, ) |
Filing 6 BRIEF in Support filed by FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(ADAMS, CHARLES) |
Filing 5 BRIEF in Opposition filed by JOHN SMITH re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Certification Certification, #6 Certificate of Service Service)(FALCIONE, ALFRED) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 7/6/2021 before Judge Robert B. Kugler. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dmr) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Responses due by 6/22/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit Exhibit X, #25 Exhibit Exhibit Y)(ADAMS, CHARLES) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. (ADAMS, CHARLES) |
Filing 2 Notice to STEPHEN LEWIS SLAVOFF, JR re mandatory eFiling. (pr,n.m) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (pr, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (pr, ) |
Judge Robert B. Kugler and Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (dd, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY from Superior Court of Burlington County, case number BUR L-000929-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12497423), filed by FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.(ADAMS, CHARLES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.