BENSON v. MURPHY et al
| JEREMY R. BENSON |
| CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GOVERNOR PHILIP D. MURPHY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 1:2021cv12014 |
| June 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Karen M Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER Pursuant to L. CIV. R. 7.1.1 (eff. June 21, 2021), the parties, including intervening parties, are required to file a statement (separate from any pleading) containing specific information regarding third-party litigation funding. See L. Civ. R. 7.1.1(a)(1-3). This statement shall be filed within 45 days of the effective date of this Rule, or no later than August 5, 2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 6/28/21. (nar)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Granting #1 Complaint Received; Directing Clerk to file complaint; SUMMONS SHALL NOT ISSUE, at this time, as the Court's sua sponte screening has not yet been completed, etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 6/7/2021. (rss, n.m.)
|
| COMPLAINT against CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PHILIP D. MURPHY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, filed by JEREMY R. BENSON. See #1 for docs.(rss, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 ENVELOPE)(alb, n.m ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
