KABADI v. BLINKEN et al
| FADOUA KABADI |
| ANTHONY BLINKEN, TRACY RENAUD, YA-MEI CHEN, JOHN E. THOMPSON, MERRICK GARLAND and RACHAEL A. HONIG |
| 1:2021cv16458 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ANTHONY BLINKEN, YA-MEI CHEN, MERRICK GARLAND, RACHAEL A. HONIG, TRACY RENAUD, JOHN E. THOMPSON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (alb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTHONY BLINKEN, YA-MEI CHEN, MERRICK GARLAND, RACHAEL A. HONIG, TRACY RENAUD, JOHN E. THOMPSON ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12770760), filed by FADOUA KABADI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit LPR Card, #3 Exhibit Response to Continuance)(VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Nature of Suit,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (dd, ) |
| Judge Noel L. Hillman added. (dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
