DOBY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Plaintiff: DAVID J. DOBY
Defendant: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SPECIAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON and SOUTHWOODS STATE PRISON
Case Number: 1:2021cv19350
Filed: October 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Christine P O'Hearn
Referring Judge: Matthew J Skahill
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Directing the Clerk to reopen this matter and file the Complaint; ORDERED that the summons shall not issue at this time, etc. Signed by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 12/2/2021. (rtm, )(nm)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order #1 COMPLAINT against BAYSIDE STATE PRISON, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUTHWOODS STATE PRISON, SPECIAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, filed by DAVID J. DOBY.(rtm, )
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Letter from David Doby re filing fee. (rtm, )(nm)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number CAM013493 (dd, )
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. (SBI# Incorrectly entered, NEF and Order #2 sent to correct address) (amv)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's IFP Without Prejudice; Directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this case and supply Plaintiff with a blank IFP application; If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case he shall notify the Court in writing within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order etc. Signed by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 11/3/2021. (pr,n.m)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 ENVELOPE)(pr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DOBY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID J. DOBY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SPECIAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BAYSIDE STATE PRISON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOUTHWOODS STATE PRISON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?