NJ PRESTIGE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC SURGERY, P.C. v. AETNA, INC. et al
NJ PRESTIGE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC SURGERY, P.C. |
AETNA, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 |
1:2021cv20358 |
December 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Sharon A King |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Order #6 . Mail sent to DARA J. LAWALL (Order resent to updated address) (dmr) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Second Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File a response to Plaintiff's Complaint by 2/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 1/18/2022. (dmr) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Motion set for 2/7/2022 before Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dmr) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by AETNA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MCCOY, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File a response to Plaintiff's Complaint by 1/17/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 12/22/2021. (dmr) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Motion set for 1/18/2022 before Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dmr) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by AETNA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MCCOY, BENJAMIN) |
Clerk's Text Order - The document #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by AETNA, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/27/2021. (dmr) |
Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Aetna, Inc... (MCCOY, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 3 Notice to DARA J. LAWALL re mandatory eFiling. (amv,n.m) |
Notice of Judicial Preferences.RMB #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (amv) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (amv) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AETNA, INC. identifying CVS PHARMACY, INC. as Corporate Parent.. (MCCOY, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AETNA, INC. from SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN COUNTY, case number CAM L 003366 21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13023543), filed by AETNA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(MCCOY, BENJAMIN) |
Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.