BROOKS v. WHELTON et al
HAMEED BROOKS |
CHRISTOPHER WHELTON, CRAIG MITNICK, HADDON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALICE I. CUPAIUOLO and NATALIE CHUTE |
1:2021cv20568 |
December 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Sharon A King |
Karen M Williams |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's IFP application and directing the Clerk to file the complaint; Dismissing Plaintiff's claims with prejudice against Defendants Christopher Whelton, Craig Mitnick, Natalie Chute, and the Haddon Heights Police Department; Dismissing claims against remainder of Defendants without prejudice; Plaintiff is granted to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Karen M. Williams on 12/21/2021. (pr,n.m) |
Filing 3 OPINION. Signed by Judge Karen M. Williams on 12/21/2021. (pr,n.m) |
COMPLAINT #1 against CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, NATALIE CHUTE, ALICE I. CUPAIUOLO, HADDON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT, CRAIG MITNICK, CHRISTOPHER WHELTON with JURY DEMAND, filed by HAMEED BROOKS.(pr, ) |
Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint Received by HAMEED BROOKS. (amv) |
Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(amv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.