PULLINGER v. ARTHUR R. TODD ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC. et al
BRIAN PULLINGER |
ARTHUR R. TODD ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC. doing business as TODD ELECTRIC and ARTHUR R. TODD |
1:2022cv00268 |
January 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Noel L Hillman |
Sharon A King |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time for Defendant Arthur R. Todd to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint until April 21, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 3/18/2022. (alb) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Time by ARTHUR R. TODD. (KUDATZKY, STEVEN) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by STEVEN KUDATZKY on behalf of ARTHUR R. TODD (KUDATZKY, STEVEN) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by BRIAN PULLINGER. ARTHUR R. TODD waiver sent on 1/21/2022, answer due 3/22/2022. (GROH, MICHAEL) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ARTHUR R. TODD ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC., ARTHUR R. TODD. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (amv) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARTHUR R. TODD ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC., ARTHUR R. TODD ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13124662) with JURY DEMAND, filed by BRIAN PULLINGER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(GROH, MICHAEL) |
Judge Noel L. Hillman and Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (dmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.