TILLERY v. BERGAMI
| DAVID MARK TILLERY |
| THOMAS E. BERGAMI |
| 1:2022cv00477 |
| January 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Christine P O'Hearn |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AMENDED PETITION by DAVID MARK TILLERY. Amendment to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (dmr) |
Filing 6
ORDER directing the Clerk to reopen this matter; Petitioner's first #3 MOTION to Amend is GRANTED; The Clerk shall file docket entry #3 at 2-24 as an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Petitioner's second #5 MOTION to Amend is DENIED AS MOOT; ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of the Amended Petition and this Order upon Respondent; ORDERED that within 60 days of the date of the entry of this Order, Respondent shall file and serve a limited answer, etc. Signed by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 3/31/2022. (dmr)(n.m.)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by DAVID MARK TILLERY. (dmr) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Motion set for 4/18/2022 before Judge Christine P. O'Hearn. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dmr) |
| Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number TRE124930 (jjc, ) |
| Filing 4 Letter from DAVID MARK TILLERY. (ld, ) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION TO AMEND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 2241. Motion set for 3/21/2022 before Judge Christine P. O'Hearn. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (tf, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO AMEND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 2241 by DAVID MARK TILLERY. (ld, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this case and supply Petitioner with a blank IFP application; If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case he shall notify the Court in writing within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order, etc. Signed by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 2/16/2022. (amv,n.m)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. NO IFP/FF, filed by DAVID MARK TILLERY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(amv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TILLERY v. BERGAMI | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DAVID MARK TILLERY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: THOMAS E. BERGAMI | |
| Represented By: | JOHN ANDREW RUYMANN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
