GRUNGO v. I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
| CHRISTOPHER GRUNGO |
| I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
| 1:2022cv01014 |
| February 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Christine P O'Hearn |
| Matthew J Skahill |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order Initial Conference set for 5/11/2022 at 10:00 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 4/7/2022. (mag)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by All Defendants.(WERTMAN, JOEL) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CHRISTOPHER GRUNGO. I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. served on 3/3/2022, answer due 3/24/2022. (JONES, JOSEPH) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Application for a Clerk's Extension #6 filed by Joel M. Wertman on 3/15/2022 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion for Extension of Time. In the future please use the correct event, "Application for Clerk Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order", found under Other Documents. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. This message is for informational purposes only. (dmr) |
| CLERK'S TEXT ORDER - The Application for a Clerk's Order Extending Time to Answer - Document #6 submitted by I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. on 3/15/2022 has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 4/7/2022. (dmr) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (WERTMAN, JOEL) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. identifying Assurant, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (WERTMAN, JOEL) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JOEL M. WERTMAN on behalf of I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. (WERTMAN, JOEL) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mag) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by CHRISTOPHER GRUNGO as to I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (JONES, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13213124) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CHRISTOPHER GRUNGO. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JONES, JOSEPH) |
| Judge Christine P. O'Hearn and Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill added. (dmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GRUNGO v. I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER GRUNGO | |
| Represented By: | JOSEPH K. JONES |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. | |
| Represented By: | JOEL M. WERTMAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
