LEE v. UNITED REVENUE COLLECTION SERVICE et al
KADAR LEE |
UNITED REVENUE COLLECTION SERVICE, DANIEL CARANGI and MICHELLE CARANGI |
1:2022cv01033 |
February 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Ann Marie Donio |
Christine P O'Hearn |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal was filed by KADAR LEE (JONES, JOSEPH) |
Filing 5 Order Administratively Terminating Action - 60 Day, Pending Consummation of Settlement. Administrative Termination deadline set for 6/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio on 4/5/2022. (mag) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Settlement was filed by KADAR LEE (JONES, JOSEPH) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to DANIEL CARANGI, MICHELLE CARANGI, UNITED REVENUE COLLECTION SERVICE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mag) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against DANIEL CARANGI, MICHELLE CARANGI, UNITED REVENUE COLLECTION SERVICE ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13214572) with JURY DEMAND, filed by KADAR LEE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(jr) |
Judge Christine P. O'Hearn and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dmw) |
Filing 1 Request for Summons to be Issued by KADAR LEE as to DANIEL CARANGI, MICHELLE CARANGI, UNITED REVENUE COLLECTION SERVICE. (JONES, JOSEPH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.