BANKS v. FORT DIX MAIL ROOM et al
| FREDERICK BANKS |
| FORT DIX MAIL ROOM, WARDEN LAMINE N'DIAYE, UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS |
| 1:2022cv01604 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Christine P O'Hearn |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 USCA Case Number 22-1836 for #3 Notice of Appeal (USCA), filed by FREDERICK BANKS. USCA Case Manager Carmella (Document Restricted - Court Only)(ca3cw, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #2 Order, by FREDERICK BANKS. The Clerk's Office hereby certifies the record and the docket sheet available through ECF to be the certified list in lieu of the record and/or the certified copy of the docket entries. (No Filing Fee or Application to Proceed IFP Submitted) (js) |
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this case and supply Petitioner with a blank IFP application; If Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 4/18/2022. (mag, N.M.)
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (mag) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus, filed by FREDERICK BANKS. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Envelope)(mag, N.M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
