SOTO v. BLINKEN et al
| SERGIO SOTO |
| ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND, CONN SCHRADER, CARL C. RISCH, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, YA-MEI CHEN, JOHN THOMPSON, PHILIP R SELLINGER and UR M. JADDOU |
| 1:2022cv01801 |
| March 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Karen M Williams |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SERGIO SOTO (VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (alb) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ANTONY BLINKEN, YA-MEI CHEN, MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, CARL C. RISCH, CONN SCHRADER, PHILIP R SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bda) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (bda) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTONY BLINKEN, YA-MEI CHEN, MERRICK GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, CARL C. RISCH, CONN SCHRADER, PHILIP R SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13299864), filed by SERGIO SOTO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit I-130, NOID, Rebuttal, Inquiries, #3 Exhibit Cover Letter)(VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
| Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
