CARR v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
| URSULA CARR |
| COUNTY CAMDEN, OFFICER SAMSON #1000, SERGEANT JANE DOE 1, JOHN/JANE DOE 2-10, COUNTY OF CAMDEN and OFFICER SAMSON |
| 1:2022cv03698 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Sharon A King |
| Karen M Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Letter from J. Brooks DiDonato, Esq.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Consent Confidentiality Order)(DIDONATO, J.)
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Caption,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jab)
|
|
Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (jab)
|
|
Judge Karen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (dmw)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by OFFICER SAMSON #1000, COUNTY CAMDEN from CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, case number CAM-L-1406-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13477314), filed by OFFICER SAMSON #1000, COUNTY CAMDEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification, #3 Certification)(DIDONATO, J.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
