SHAKUR v. WALCOFF et al
| JIHAD TALIB-DIN ABDUL SHAKUR |
| MS. DANIELLE WALCOFF, MR. NATE CABERTO, MR. GARY BROWN and MS. URSULA MARTINEZ |
| 1:2022cv04306 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Christine P O'Hearn |
| Elizabeth A Pascal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order Granting IFP Application; ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the Complaint; ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Judge Walcoff, the Administrator Defendants, and Martinez are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 6/30/2022. (dmr)(n.m.)
|
| COMPLAINT (Refer to Doc. #1 ) against GARY BROWN, NATE CABERTO, URSULA MARTINEZ, DANIELLE WALCOFF, filed by JIHAD TALIB-DIN ABDUL SHAKUR.(dmr) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (dmr) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jab) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION/MOTION for Termination of Child Support Garnishments by JIHAD TALIB-DIN ABDUL SHAKUR. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Statement of Facts)(jab). |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application IFP, #3 Consent to Receive Documents Electronically, #4 Certification of Facts, #5 Envelope)(jab). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/29/2022: #6 Text of Proposed Order) (jab, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
