BROCCO et al v. TTX COMPANY
ANTHONY N. BROCCO, SR. and JEANNETTE BROCCO |
TTX COMPANY |
1:2022cv04359 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Matthew J Skahill |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Dismissing without prejudice #1 Plaintiff's Complaint; Directing the Clerk to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 8/3/2022. (amv) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiffs shall Show Cause, by 7/15/2022, (1) that complete diversity exists between the parties and (2) that the damages alleged in this suit in fact exceed $75,000. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/6/2022. (amv) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to TTX COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jab) |
Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (jab) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jab) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TTX COMPANY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13530330) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ANTHONY N. BROCCO, SR, JEANNETTE BROCCO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PORTNER, SCOTT) |
Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill added. (mmb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.